Home Up

Click here to go to
The Press Democrat's transcription
of the commission decision and findings

Minister cleared in gay marriage case

Presbyterian tribunal in Santa Rosa rules church law doesn't bar same-sex weddings

By GUY KOVNER
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT
Santa Rosa CA
March 4, 2006

A Santa Rosa Presbyterian church tribunal on Friday rejected charges against a minister who admitted marrying two lesbian couples, issuing an unprecedented ruling that church law doesn't prohibit same-sex marriages.

"We feel thankful, grateful," the Rev. Jane Adams Spahr of San Rafael said moments after the tribunal's 6-1 decision in her favor was announced at the Church of the Roses.

The ruling capped a two-day church trial that attracted national attention and, according to her backers, sends a message throughout the 2.4 million-member Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), which has wrestled with the issue of gay marriage for 30 years.

Spahr, 63, a lesbian activist, said she will continue to marry both homosexual and heterosexual couples.

The Rev. Jane Adams Spahr, left, listens with lawyers Timothy Cahn and Sara Taylor as the decision rejecting charges against her is read.
Click on photo to enlarge


Speaking of the gay and lesbian community she ministers to, Spahr said, "We've lost many things, but today is just a beautiful day for us."

"This is a decisive moment," said Timothy Cahn, one of Spahr's two lawyers and a Presbyterian Church elder.

Neither of the lesbian couples' marriages was recognized by civil authorities. Spahr was accused of violating church law for performing the ceremonies.

Had she been convicted, Spahr, ordained as a Presbyterian minister in 1974, could have been reprimanded or removed from the ministry.

Spahr's attorneys said she won on two counts, as the tribunal of ministers and church elders ruled that the church constitution and case law do not "prohibit the performance" of same-sex marriages.

The tribunal also endorsed Spahr's argument in ruling she was "acting within her right of conscience" in performing the marriages.

The decision applies only to the Presbytery of the Redwoods, a regional body of the church that spans the North Coast from Marin County to the Oregon border.
But it will be "instructive" to other presbyteries, said Sara Taylor, Spahr's other lawyer. "We hope it's a signal of great things to come."

"This is going to get considerable attention," said the Rev. Robert Conover, who holds the title of stated clerk, a leadership position in the presbytery. "It is high profile."
The Rev. Jane Adams Spahr, third from left, prays with supporters and her lawyers Friday before a Presbyterian church tribunal rejected charges against her for marrying two lesbian couples.
Click to enlarge photo

The local presbytery, which brought the charges against Spahr, can appeal the decision, but Conover said he could not predict "how the presbytery might respond."

An appeal to a higher church body would be expensive, a factor the presbytery would have to consider, Conover said.

"We don't have any money," he said.

Conover said trial cost the presbytery about $30,000.

Spahr's attorneys had said they would appeal any verdict against her.

The tribunal, known as the Permanent Judicial Commission, deliberated for five hours, while Spahr and her attorneys and allies waited in the church library.

"It's a beautiful, wonderful feeling to feel accepted in this church," said Barbara Jean Douglass of Rochester, N.Y., who was married by Spahr in 2004 to her partner, Connie Valois.

"Today I feel like anyone else who's gotten married," said Sherrill Figuera of Guerneville, married by Spahr last May to Annie Senechal on the Sonoma Coast near Jenner.

The two lesbian weddings were the basis for the charges against Spahr, which were prompted by an inquiry from the Rev. James Berkley, a Seattle Presbyterian minister.

Redwoods Presbytery officials testified Thursday they were aware of Spahr's same-sex weddings.

In his closing argument Friday, Cahn urged the commission members to use their heads and their hearts to reach a verdict. Because the church has not clearly ruled that marrying homosexuals is an offense, "there is a reasonable doubt as to the guilt of Reverend Spahr," he said.

Two commissioners queried Cahn about the meaning of the word "proper," referring to a Presbyterian committee's 1991 interpretation that same-sex marriages "would not be proper."

In its majority ruling, six commissioners noted the interpretation did not use "mandatory language."

"Therefore, we find that no offense has been committed," the decision said in part.

In a minority report, commissioner Janet Moor, a church elder from Benicia, wrote that same-sex marriages were forbidden by the church Constitution. She cited the section that says: "For Christians, marriage is a covenant through which a man and a woman are called to live out together before God their lives of discipleship."

In his closing argument, Stephen Taber, an attorney prosecuting Spahr, told the tribunal it was a not a complex case. "The rules are pretty clear," he said.

Describing Spahr as "a great asset to the presbytery," Taber, a former member of the Presbyterian Church's highest court, said she nonetheless has "an obligation to subject herself to the discipline of the church."

Spahr, a grandmother, said she is preparing to marry her son, Chet, and his fiancee, as well as a lesbian couple.

Before the verdict, Spahr said she was grateful for the trial because it gave lesbian couples a chance to tell their story.

"I think it's God's story," she said. "Any time marginalized people have a chance to speak."
 

Return to the top

 

Transcript:
Presbyterian Church tribunal's ruling

PRESBYTERY OF THE REDWOODS PERMANENT JUDICIAL COMMISSION

Presbyterian Church (USA) through the Presbytery of the Redwoods Complainant, Vs. The Rev. Dr. Jane Adams Spahr Accused
Case 2004 Concerning "Minister B"
Trial Date: March 2, 2006

DECISION

The Permanent Judicial Commission of the Redwoods Presbytery, having conducted a trial in the above proceeding, and having deliberated and voted in accord with Section D-11.0403 of the Book of Order, reports its decision as follows:

The issue before this commission is: How does the constitution - specifically the Book of Order (Sec. G-6.0108 and Sec. W-4.9001), the authoritative Interpretation of 1991/1993 (hereafter AI), and the Benton Case - apply to the charges against the Rev. Dr. Jane Adams Spahr, (hereafter Spahr)?

Findings

1. Section W-4.9001 is a definition, not a directive. We note that its application to the performance of marriage ceremonies for couples of the same sex has been disputed, at the highest levels of polity, for 15 years - i.e. at least since the request for an interpretation made in 1991 to the Advisory Committee on the Constitution. The issue remains unsettled because the authors of the AI, having available a lexicon in the preface to the Book of Order, chose to say that such marriages "would not be proper" rather than use mandatory language. The AI establishes the performance of same sex marriages as a matter of propriety. We find that neither the AI or the Benton Case prohibit the performance of such marriages by ministers of the Word and Sacrament. Therefore, we find that no offense has been committed within the meaning of Sec. D-2.0203(b).

2.Section G-6.0108 describes the scope of freedom of conscience within boundaries. The subject of same sex marriage has not been shown to be outside of, or contrary to, the essentials of the Reformed faith as understood by Presbytery of the Redwoods. Conscience is subordinate to constitutional mandates and to essentials of the Reformed faith, but conscience takes precedence over propriety. We find that Spahr was acting within her right of conscience in performing marriage ceremonies for same sex couples. We also find that the accused acted within the normative standards of Redwood Presbytery, faithfully reporting to it her activities at reasonable intervals.

Concluding affirmation

We affirm that the fundamental message of the Scriptures and Confessions is the proclamation of the Good News of God's love for all people. It is a message of inclusiveness, reconciliation, and the breaking down of barriers that separate humans from each other, and that this proclamation has primacy in the conduct of the Church.

By :

Elder Ray Alden, Moderator

The Rev. Douglas Huneke, Clerk

The Rev. Lynda Burris

The Rev. Robert Jones

Elder Dee Schilling

Elder Michael Stone

Return to the top