Minister cleared in gay marriage case
Presbyterian tribunal in Santa Rosa rules church law doesn't bar
same-sex weddingsBy GUY KOVNER THE PRESS DEMOCRAT
Santa Rosa CA
March 4, 2006A Santa Rosa Presbyterian church tribunal on Friday rejected
charges against a minister who admitted marrying two lesbian
couples, issuing an unprecedented ruling that church law doesn't
prohibit same-sex marriages.
"We feel thankful, grateful," the Rev. Jane Adams Spahr of San
Rafael said moments after the tribunal's 6-1 decision in her favor
was announced at the Church of the Roses. |
The ruling capped a two-day church trial that attracted national
attention and, according to her backers, sends a message throughout
the 2.4 million-member Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), which has
wrestled with the issue of gay marriage for 30 years.
Spahr, 63, a lesbian activist, said she will continue to marry both
homosexual and heterosexual couples. |
The
Rev. Jane Adams Spahr, left, listens with lawyers Timothy Cahn and Sara
Taylor as the decision rejecting charges against her is read.
Click on photo to enlarge |
Speaking of the gay and lesbian community she ministers to, Spahr
said, "We've lost many things, but today is just a beautiful day for
us."
"This is a decisive moment," said Timothy Cahn, one of Spahr's two
lawyers and a Presbyterian Church elder.
Neither of the lesbian couples' marriages was recognized by civil
authorities. Spahr was accused of violating church law for
performing the ceremonies.
Had she been convicted, Spahr, ordained as a Presbyterian minister
in 1974, could have been reprimanded or removed from the ministry.
Spahr's attorneys said she won on two counts, as the tribunal of
ministers and church elders ruled that the church constitution and
case law do not "prohibit the performance" of same-sex marriages.
The tribunal also endorsed Spahr's argument in ruling she was
"acting within her right of conscience" in performing the marriages.
The decision applies only to the Presbytery of the Redwoods, a
regional body of the church that spans the North Coast from Marin
County to the Oregon border. |
But it will be "instructive" to other presbyteries, said Sara
Taylor, Spahr's other lawyer. "We hope it's a signal of great things
to come."
"This is going to get considerable attention," said the Rev. Robert
Conover, who holds the title of stated clerk, a leadership position
in the presbytery. "It is high profile." |
The
Rev. Jane Adams Spahr, third from left, prays with supporters and her
lawyers Friday before a Presbyterian church tribunal rejected charges
against her for marrying two lesbian couples.
Click to enlarge photo |
The local presbytery, which brought the charges against Spahr, can
appeal the decision, but Conover said he could not predict "how the
presbytery might respond."
An appeal to a higher church body would be expensive, a factor the
presbytery would have to consider, Conover said.
"We don't have any money," he said.
Conover said trial cost the presbytery about $30,000.
Spahr's attorneys had said they would appeal any verdict against
her.
The tribunal, known as the Permanent Judicial Commission,
deliberated for five hours, while Spahr and her attorneys and allies
waited in the church library.
"It's a beautiful, wonderful feeling to feel accepted in this
church," said Barbara Jean Douglass of Rochester, N.Y., who was
married by Spahr in 2004 to her partner, Connie Valois.
"Today I feel like anyone else who's gotten married," said Sherrill
Figuera of Guerneville, married by Spahr last May to Annie Senechal
on the Sonoma Coast near Jenner.
The two lesbian weddings were the basis for the charges against
Spahr, which were prompted by an inquiry from the Rev. James
Berkley, a Seattle Presbyterian minister.
Redwoods Presbytery officials testified Thursday they were aware of
Spahr's same-sex weddings.
In his closing argument Friday, Cahn urged the commission members to
use their heads and their hearts to reach a verdict. Because the
church has not clearly ruled that marrying homosexuals is an
offense, "there is a reasonable doubt as to the guilt of Reverend
Spahr," he said.
Two commissioners queried Cahn about the meaning of the word
"proper," referring to a Presbyterian committee's 1991
interpretation that same-sex marriages "would not be proper."
In its majority ruling, six commissioners noted the interpretation
did not use "mandatory language."
"Therefore, we find that no offense has been committed," the
decision said in part.
In a minority report, commissioner Janet Moor, a church elder from
Benicia, wrote that same-sex marriages were forbidden by the church
Constitution. She cited the section that says: "For Christians,
marriage is a covenant through which a man and a woman are called to
live out together before God their lives of discipleship."
In his closing argument, Stephen Taber, an attorney prosecuting
Spahr, told the tribunal it was a not a complex case. "The rules are
pretty clear," he said.
Describing Spahr as "a great asset to the presbytery," Taber, a
former member of the Presbyterian Church's highest court, said she
nonetheless has "an obligation to subject herself to the discipline
of the church."
Spahr, a grandmother, said she is preparing to marry her son, Chet,
and his fiancee, as well as a lesbian couple.
Before the verdict, Spahr said she was grateful for the trial
because it gave lesbian couples a chance to tell their story.
"I think it's God's story," she said. "Any time marginalized people
have a chance to speak." |
| |
|
Return to the top |