|
While the ruling does not bind other church judicial commissions
regarding same-sex marriages, Spahr's attorney, Timothy Cahn, said
it sets a favorable precedent for half a dozen other ministers who
are being prosecuted for performing such nuptials.
"This will be an example to others around the country," he said.
Spahr, 63, became an ordained minister in 1974 while married to a
man, but was allowed to maintain her status as a minister after
coming out as a lesbian in 1978. Although she was barred from
fronting a church in 1991, she became a "lesbian evangelist" for the
church.
The church's national organization charged Spahr with two counts
of violating the constitution - for a same-sex marriage in 2004 and
for another in 2005 - after a minister from Washington state
complained she had violated the church's constitution, which defines
marriage as a covenant between a man and a woman. Under a ruling by
the national church's highest court in 2000, Presbyterian ministers
may bless same-sex unions as long as they do not equate the
relationships with marriage.
During the two-day trial before the tribunal of the Presbytery of
the Redwoods - which oversees 52 churches from north of San
Francisco to the Oregon border - Spahr testified that she performed
both ceremonies, considered them marriages and wrote about them in
her annual reports to the church despite knowing the church's
constitution defined marriage as a union between a man and a woman.
She said her conscience told her that treating gay couples
differently than heterosexual couples was no different than defining
them as second-class citizens, and the church's history of
progressive stances against slavery, racism and banning women from
becoming ministers backed that up.
"I'm so grateful," she said after the ruling. "People have
honored that."
In their majority ruling, the six judicial members said the
church does not explicitly prohibit marriage of same-sex couples;
Spahr "acted within the normative standards" of the region; and
Spahr's action is affirmed by "the fundamental message of the
Scriptures and Confessions" that "is a message of inclusiveness,
reconciliation, and the breaking down of barriers that separate
humans from each other."
"We find that Spahr was acting within her right of conscience in
performing marriage ceremonies for same-sex couples," the majority
wrote.
In her dissenting opinion, Janet Moor, a church elder from
Benicia, said ministers pledge to be governed by the church's
constitution and that considers marriage between a man and woman.
"I agree with the prosecution that the beliefs of the accused are
to be respected, but that the actions of the accused must still be
constrained by what is prohibited by the constitution," she wrote.
Barbara Jean Douglass, a former San Rafael High School student
body president who asked Spahr to perform her same-sex marriage in
Rochester, N.Y., and testified Thursday with her partner, said she
feels her relationship is validated by the ruling.
"It's a beautiful, wonderful feeling to be accepted by the
church," she said. |